The reason these books were challenged? "The resident who filed the original complaint targeted these three books because 'they teach principles contrary to the Bible.'" Um, wow... In the article Scroggins states: “I congratulate them for doing what’s right and removing the two books. It’s unfortunate they chose to keep the other book.” Not only am I incredibly disappointed in the actions taken by Scroggins to have important works of literature removed from schools, but I am also increasingly disappointed in the actions of school boards when voting on these sorts of issues: "It is important to note that, out of the four School Board Members, only one has actually read all three books."
Melissa Duvall, the only board member to have read all three books proposed to be banned, said the school board's vote was more about policy and less a criticism of the books in question. (From UPI.com)This behaviour from school boards is incomprehensible and irresponsible. How can school boards expect students to make their own informed decisions if they are not willing to do the same themselves. By not reading the books in question and saying the vote is about policy is ignorance, pure and simple. If the vote were about policy, the books would be used as examples in an argument, but in this case, the books are the objects in question, therefore making the vote ABOUT THE BOOKS. If this were so, a policy would have been voted on, not books. And since it was about the books, Ms. Duvall, EVERY member of the board should have been REQUIRED to read them! How is this so difficult to understand at the administrative level!
I will stop writing now for fear that my keyboard will melt under the fury of my quickly typing fingers. To leave off on a slightly more "fun" note, I am including, below, a passage from The Rejectionist (a site no longer available) in which the writings of Mr. Scroggins were put under a microscope and then ridiculed merrily passage by passage. Enjoy! And comment!
Thanks for listening.
Scroggins wrote, about Twenty Boy Summer: In this book, drunken teens also end up on the beach, where they use their condoms to have sex.
And how, pray tell, does a drunken teen use “condoms to have sex”? We consider ourselves pretty worldly, good sir, but we are quite baffled as to the exact logistics involved in “us[ing] their condoms to have sex.” Perhaps you are more well-versed in the vagaries of kink than this innocent Rejectionist, Dr. Scroggins. A little light shed on the technicalities of this activity would be most useful, as we are left here to our imagination, which we must admit is failing us entirely.